The Martin County

 

  Defender

 

The e-newsletter for aware citizens – No. 82

 

 

 

Facing the budget crunch

 

 

 

Budget shortfalls are hitting cities, counties and states across the country.  Florida’s shortfall of $5.1 billion, third largest in the nation, is likely to mean that the state will try to offload more financial obligations on Martin and other counties. If we do not take early action, we could end up like Philadelphia (11 of 54 libraries closed) or Atlanta (salaries of 4,600 employees cut). 

 

One of our long time exasperations with the county’s wasteful spending relates to consultants. At the Dec. 2 Commission meeting, Commissioner Sarah Heard questioned why we are paying consultants who currently work on projects which will not be built for lack of funding. We are told staff is working on a plan to solve that problem, but why was there not such a plan in place six months or a year ago when the crunch was looming. 

 

There is a philosophical issue on what to do with new income that becomes available. This past week the Commission decided, 4-to-1 with Valliere dissenting, that an estimated $250,000 to be gained from allowing cellphone towers in our parks would go into the Parks Department fund so parks can be kept clean,  toilets open, and equipment maintained properly. County Administrator Duncan Ballantyne wanted the money to go into the General Fund to avoid a possible bad precedent for other departments. Of course, money sort of vanishes in a General Fund. Commission’s political focus rules when dealing with a highly visible quality of life issue.

 

 

 

Foreclosure help is on the way 

 

There are some 1,400 Martin County properties currently in foreclosure, of which about 200 have reached final judgment. This is more than ten times the normal rate. Further, there are 2,400 properties, with such characteristics as sub-prime mortgages and no owner equity, that are in danger of foreclosure. 

 

To deal with the problem, the county has set up a Foreclosure Task Force led by Community Redevelopment Director Jeff Oris. He outlined the four-phase plan developed by the task force as follows: 

 

-          Prevent foreclosures where possible

 

-          Assist residents forced into foreclosure

 

-          Preserve neighborhoods affected by abandoned houses

 

-          Seek state funding for neighborhood stabilization 

 

About $3 million in federal/state funds may be available for this purpose in Martin County, but it is uncertain whether we can get it. Oris will be working to involve a wide range of leaders and organizations to achieve task force goals. Efforts should focus on homesteaders and family businesses, rather than speculators. We hope those asked to participate will step forward to help. 

 

Until Martin’s effort becomes fully operational, residents needing advice about preventing foreclosure can obtain useful information online at www.hopenow.com, or phone 1-888-995-4673. The Federal Office of Housing and Urban Development’s Consumer Counseling Service at 1-800-741-7040 may also be able to help. 

 

There are plenty of mortgage counseling scams around. You can check with the Florida Attorney General’ Consumer Hotline at 1-866-966-7226.

 

 

 

School Board may be losing public support 

 

Some School Board actions this year are causing people to question the wisdom and propriety of its decisions. First is the issue of openness. All these years the Board failed to provide MCTV coverage of its meetings. Now we will have it thanks to the determination and some dollars from a few businessmen. Separately, when it was reported that the former superintendent was skirting the public records law by having e-mails sent to her secretary, the Board did nothing. 

 

Second, in what appeared to be a vindictive act aimed at incoming Superintendent Nancy Kline, the Board broke precedent by signing a three-year contract with the assistant superintendent instead of the usual one-year. Was that payback for Kline’s frequent dissents when she was on the Board? 

 

Third, the Board cuts public input by reducing speaking time from five to three minutes. That partly silences the very people who are the most devoted and willing to speak up about education issues. The excuse that five minute speeches take up too much time is unconvincing. They could meet a second time during the month. Or they could bunch all those nice but time-consuming ceremonial presentations into one Saturday. 

 

Ms. Kline is willing and able to shake up some school matters that need to be changed, especially with regard to transparency, costs and bringing others into the education picture. Our children would benefit by the School Board being more supportive of the newly elected superintendent. 

 

 

Correction of EAR schedule 

 

In DEFENDER No. 81, we noted the general schedule of EAR (Evaluation and Appraisal Report) hearings over the next 15 months. Through a miscommunication, we erroneously stated that there would be public workshops on the amendments to the Comp Plan in January 2009 at dates and times to be announced. In fact, Growth Management staff is still working on a schedule, due for completion next month, for LPA (Local Planning Agency) public hearings. County staff expects to start taking amendments to the LPA in January, and to begin advertising workshops in January. 

 

EAR-LPA FOLLOW-UP

 

At the Dec. 4, 2008 LPA meeting, Martin’s Growth Management staff presented a well conceived approach to developing the EAR document.  There was particular focus on Land use (Chapter 4), Coastal (Chapter 8), and Conservation (Chapter (9). Even prior to public hearings on these three elements, citizens can not only make general comments, but they can present detailed proposed drafts of amendments for consideration. One leading developer said he plans to do so. Submissions and comments should be sent to Growth Management Director Nicki vanVonno: nikkiv@martin.fl.us . Public comments may be sent simultaneously to LPA’s Administrative Specialist Joan Seaman at jseaman@martin.fl.us

 

As part of making Comp Plan provisions consistent and compatible with one another, and correcting scrivener errors, Growth Management plans to have it reviewed for understandable, plain language. Good idea, but here is where we run into an uh-oh. They plan to hire still another consultant to act as an editor to achieve clarity. Bad idea in these financially difficult times. It’s falling back on no longer affordable old habits: extra work – hire a consultant. If there aren’t a couple of county employees literate enough to edit for language clarity, then bring in some volunteers. There are plenty of competent residents in the county who would be willing do that – free!

 

 

Which commissioners are doing a second-rate job in posting public record e-mails? 

 

Any e-mail sent to a commissioner at the county facility becomes a public record – including those with the boiler plate statement that the e-mail is a privileged private communication. To facilitate open and transparent government, the county provides website space for commissioners to post - in a timely fashion - the e-mails they received. 

 

Some commissioners do an excellent job, keeping residents up to date. They include Commissioners Hayes and Heard. Ciampi is only one day late. However, two commissioners are laggards in posting e-mails: As of Dec. 4, Commissioner Valliere is almost three weeks behind, and Commissioner Smith is over two weeks late, which is not good constituent service. Get crackin’ guys! 

 

+++++ 

 

For a free subscription to The Martin County Defender, send request with “Subscribe” in the subject line to: mcdefender@gmail.com 

 

Comments and requests to unsubscribe may be sent to this same address.

 

Al

 

Al Forman, Editor                                  12/6/08 

Sphere: Related Content

 

The Martin County

  Defender

The e-newsletter for aware citizens – No. 75

 

A prediction contest for you to become

2008 Political Seer of the Year 

The DEFENDER  is sponsoring a contest to find the Martin citizens able to predict who will be victorious – and by how much - in the three 2008 County Commission   elections. In addition to being awarded a plaque commemorating their clairvoyant skills, and gaining public recognition, top contest winners will receive the following prizes: 

First Prize: $75 Cash

Second Prize: $25 gift certificate to Manero’s Restaurant, Palm City

Third Prize: $20 gift certificate to Carrabbas Italian Grill, Stuart 

It’s easy to enter. Here is all you need to do: 

1 – Click on REPLY. 

2 - Fill in your name, and mark “X” next to “I have voted or will vote….”  (   

– Next to one candidate in each District, Mark “X” for the one you think, not hope, will win. Then fill in the percent of votes for that District which you guess your chosen candidate will receive. Example: 

Candidate John Doe ( X ) – percent of District vote (  56% ) 

4 – Click on SEND. 

Type in  →

                           Last Name,     First Name

“I have voted or will vote in the 2008 election”  - Mark here → (     

Candidates listed alphabetically by district 

 

DISTRICT 1 (Choose one) 

Tom Fullman (    ) – percent of District vote (    %)

Doug Smith (    ) – percent of District vote (    %)

Joan Wilcox (    ) – percent of District vote (    %) 

 

DISTRICT 3 (Choose one) 

Martha Bennett (    ) – percent of District vote (    %)

Patrick Hayes (    ) – percent of District vote (    %) 

 

DISTRICT 5 (Choose one) 

Ed Ciampi (    ) – percent of District vote (    %)

Linda Green (    ) – percent of District vote (    %)

John Patteson (    ) – percent of District vote (    %) 

 

Winners will be chosen based on predicting all three successful candidates correctly. The ranking of the top contest winners will depend on who guesses most closely the percent of total votes for that District that were cast for the victor. 

Only one entry allowed per individual or e-mail address. Contest open only to voters registered in Martin County. Deadline is Nov. 2, 2008 

The “2008 Political Seer of the Year” contest is part of the DEFENDER’S effort to encourage citizens to vote, and to enjoy the process. 

NOTE: Early voting starts Oct. 20. Questions? Call Election Center: 772-288-5637.

+++++ 

 

For a free subscription to The Martin County Defendersend request with “Subscribe” in the subject line to: mcdefender@gmail.com

 

Comments and requests to unsubscribe may be sent to this same address.

Al

Al Forman, Editor                                  10/15/08

The Martin County Defender is published and Copyright 2008 by WordsmithAmerica,

Box 1828, Palm City, FL 34991. All rights reserved. No part of this issue may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording for public or private use, or by any information storage or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the publisher. NOTICE:  All correspondence not bearing legal copyright notice which is sent to the Defender or its editor is subject to being edited and published.

 

All previous issues of the Defender are archived at our website:

 

www.MartinCountyDefender.com

 

--
  Al Forman
  mc_defender@fastmail.net
Sphere: Related Content

The Martin County

 

  Defender

 

The e-newsletter for aware citizens – No. 74

 

A clear-eyed view of the District 1 race …..

With only a couple of exceptions, readers were pleased with our report in DEFENDER No. 73 on the national financial meltdown, and its implications for Martin County.  We stated:

“New twists in regulations and financing will trickle down to Martin County. We expect, or at least hope, that our locally elected officials know enough about the law and about financial management to be capable of looking out for all Martin residents. So if we want at least one commissioner to be well versed in the arcane skills that will be sorely needed in the days ahead, it makes good sense to elect Joan Wilcox in District 1.”

A number of readers tuned in to the fact that the rules governing financial administration will be more complex than ever before, and that a commissioner with exceptional qualifications would be a great asset for the county. Here is one letter we received:

Mr. R: I usually don’t agree with your editorials, but your issue 73 explanation about the need to elect a commissioner with good legal and financial management credentials made sense. I was going to vote for her opponent, but after I went to the Joan Wilcox web site [www.joanwilcox08.com] I decided to vote for her. Her qualifications are super and as you say sorely needed.

It’s heartening to see citizens rise above preconceived political preferences for the good of the county.

  

….. Versus the view of a smear crew

 

I have been receiving a few mean spirited, similarly worded comments, the result of an apparent concerted effort, to smear Commission District 1 candidate Joan Wilcox, and to support Tom Fullman. None of them deal with Wilcox’s exceptional experience in financial management, experience that is so badly needed on the Commission. Rather they … well, here are samples to see for yourself:

Joan is a very ambitious lady, need I say more.

She was the supposed “brains” behind her husband when he was a commissioner because he was dumb as a stump.

Are you sure God didn’t tell you to vote for the spoiler Wilcox? 

Wilcox has the typical nasty Republican outlook on life just like her dipstick husband.

Of course, venomous accusations tell a lot more about the accuser than the accused. Nevertheless, following Journalism 101, I tried to uncover facts. I exchanged e-mails with one of the scornful crew:

Ms. H: Who the hell knows who Joan is? (the Spoiler) Do you really think Joan is going to do what you and your people want her to? She has her own agenda.

Editor: Thank you for your comments. As to “She has her own agenda,” could you please be specific about what that agenda is? And what evidence do you have to support your contention?

Ms. H:  I will get back to you on that!  [Never heard from her again – Ed.]

I suspect that Mr. Fullman has not known of these baseless smears, but he knows now. He would be raising the level of political discourse if he told such desperate  supporters to knock off their toxic innuendos.

  

Unseat the Justice who doesn’t trust citizens

 

Unlike the straightforward election of local judges, a relatively complex appointment process is set forth in the Florida Constitution for selection of Supreme Court Justices. It requires the creation of a Judicial Nominating Commission composed of persons appointed to staggered four year terms, representing various interests. The Commission must submit to the Governor of Florida between three and six names for each vacancy on the court, from which the Governor selects the new Justice. The Governor’s selection is final and requires no further approval by any governmental body.

After appointment, the new Justice must face statewide voters in the next general election that is more than one year after the date of initial appointment. In this “merit retention” election, voters decide only if the new Justice will remain in office. If not retained in office, the Governor appoints a replacement through the same Judicial Nominating Commission process. After this first merit retention election, Justices face the voters in the same type of merit retention election every six years thereafter until they leave or reach retirement age.

An interesting case, Strand v. Escambia County, was decided last year by the Florida Supreme Court.  Under political pressure, it recently reversed itself. The case revolved around whether the County could issue bonds without the approval of a popular vote. On Sept. 6, 2007, the Supreme Court decided: “We conclude that the County is without authority to issue these bonds without first obtaining approval by referendum as required by article VII, section 12 of the Florida Constitution.”

After extensive lobbying by government officials (technically called amicus curiae briefs) who want to hold the purse strings, the Supreme Court on Sept. 18, 2008 changed its mind and said that counties could load debt on its citizens without their approval.  One Justice who voted against citizen control was Justice Charles T. Wells, who was first appointed in 1994. He is up for retention election. That gives us the opportunity to let the court, and everyone else, know that we do not approve of removing debt control from citizens.

Express your disapproval on the Nov. 4 ballot by voting NOT to retain Justice Wells.

 

Stuart Group V Commission race

 

In DEFENDER No. 72, we noted the entry of challenger Robert Steinberg in the race for the Group V Stuart City Commission.  The platform of incumbent Mary K. Hutchinson, running for re-election, has become available. It lists her accomplishments, and her efforts to increase a sense of community in Stuart.

Among Ms. Hutchinson’s goals for the next two years are to use her financial background to keep the City on a sound, fiscal policy, and to push for tougher environmental regulations. She plans to work with the Business Development Board to assist current businesses to grow. A more detailed copy of the platform may be obtained by contacting Ms. Hutchinson at:

mk@hutchinsonartgallery.com

Both candidates agree on various issues, but there is a difference in emphasis. Mr. Steinberg appears more concerned about homeowner protection against increasing density, while Ms. Hutchinson appears more focused on furthering business growth.

COUNTY VOTER REGISTRATION EXCEEDS 100,000

For the first time, the number of registered Martin County voters has passed 100,000. This includes Republicans 50.2%; Democrats 28.8%; Others 21.0%.

NEWSPAPER ENDORSEMENT PREDICTABILITY – 100%

The Stuart News has endorsed all three Commission candidates running on the Republican ticket. The Palm Beach Post has endorsed all three Commission candidates running on the Democratic ticket. What else is new?

HUMBLING THOUGHT OF THE DAY:No one likes the media. Even the media doesn’t like the media.” – National columnist Peggy Noonan

 

+++++

 

For a free subscription to The Martin County Defender, send request with “Subscribe” in the subject line to: mcdefender@gmail.com

Comments and requests to unsubscribe may be sent to this same address.

 

Al

 

Al Forman, Editor                                  10/10/08

The Martin County Defender is published and Copyright 2008 by WordsmithAmerica, . All rights reserved. No part of this issue may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording for public or private use, or by any information storage or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the publisher. NOTICE:  All correspondence not bearing legal copyright notice which is sent to the Defender or its editor is subject to being edited and published.

 All previous issues of the Defender are archived at our website:

 www.MartinCountyDefender.com

–   Al Forman   mc_defender@fastmail.net

Box 1828, Palm City, FL 34991

Sphere: Related Content

Privacy Policy

© 2008 SailfishCity.com - A Stuart Florida Community Site