The Martin County
Defender
The e-newsletter for aware citizens – No. 65
Who owns Martin County’s land?
Defender DOES SOME NUMBER CRUNCHING
Martin County encompasses 355,705 acres of land and 126,215 acres of water. There are 87 owners of large tracts of land, those over 500 acres. 78 of them are private individuals or corporations according to the records of the Tax Assessor. 9 are government bodies or quasi-public institutions. It may be recalled that 500 acres was the minimum size to qualify for the benefits of clustering under the Valliere Rural Cluster Amendment to the Comp Plan.
The top 16 owners, accounting for 168,904 acres, include:
South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) - 55,374 acres
State of Florida - 27,115 acres
Carlos Garcia-Velez - 12,611 acres
Florida Power & Light - 11,800 acres
Tesoro Groves Ltd Partnership - 11,448 acres
Bull Hammock Ranch Ltd - 6,727 acres
Martin County - 6,394 acres
St. Lucie River Co. Ltd - 5,835 acres
Charles M. Armstrong - 5,738 acres
Groves 14 LLC - 4,170 acres
St. Lucie Partners LLC - 3,899 acres
Turtle Beach Ltd - 3,697 acres
Shadow Lake Groves, Inc - 3,635 acres
Caulkins Citrus Co. Ltd - 3,587 acres
Camayen Cattle Co. - 3,551 acres
Becker Holding Corp. - 3,323 acres
Excluding the three government bodies (SFWMD, state and county), the top 13 private landowners account for 80,021 acres, or 22.5%% of the county’s land. The balance of other private 500-acre-plus ownership totals 77,960 acres. Thus the grand total of private 500-plus ownership is 157,981 acres, or 44.4% of Martin’s total land area - almost all of it a prospect for sprawling cluster housing unless the Valliere amendment is rescinded.
Do Chamber members support scuzzy flier?
The widely reported distribution of a fear-mongering political flier by Jensen Beach Chamber of Commerce Exec Director Ron Rose may end up as a complaint filed with the Florida Election Commission. Rose has refused to name the source of the fliers. The handbill’s intent was clearly to scare people into voting against specifically named commission candidates. In bush-league style, it told voters “to be very afraid” of these candidates and their supporters. This is very different from just disagreeing on policy.
The flier was anonymous, probably a violation of election law that requires a disclaimer notification. It will be of legal interest if any Chamber resources were used (including man-hours for an exec expected to attend such events), the quantity printed, and the paid distribution by one or more persons hired for this purpose.
Chamber members should ask themselves two questions:
Would you personally have distributed such a flier?
The flier has had the backlash effect of provoking anti-business sentiment at a time when the economic downturn needs stronger public support for local business. Therefore -
Do you think it was appropriate for Mr. Rose to distribute that flier?
The integrity of the business community may rest on how Chamber members answer … and what they do about it.
ATTENTION VOTERS
When you see those costly ads
and mailings by commission
candidate Doug Smith, remember:
YOU ARE LOOKING AT
DEVELOPER-CONNECTED MONEY
A hilarious spoof of wasted tax money
In case you missed the jovial column by St. Pete Times writer Howard Troxler in the Stuart News, here are the highlights of his skewering the idea that it’s wise to spend tens of millions of dollars of tax money as incentive to get (maybe) a hundred jobs from new businesses. Troxler proposes a business that would do the following with the multi-million corporate welfare giveaway:
* For $30 million, he guarantees to create 100 new jobs paying $100,000/yr.
* The jobs will last at least three years.
* All jobs will be filled by the local work force.
* All purchasing will occur here.
* Every dollar spent will have a multiplier effect.
His “incentive” proposal is to hire 100 people to sit around and drink beer!
It’s a better deal for taxpayers than what we’ve seen in some counties. The government does not have to build roads or any other infrastructure. It does not have to create any tax breaks, increase resident taxes, or hire more staff. And the plan directly benefits good citizens looking for work instead of luring out-of-state prosperous companies that bring in their own high paid senior staff.
Make mine a Bud, please (;-)
(EDITOR’S NOTE: Incentive plans are not a substitute for the good idea of helping companies already here.)
+++++
- NO MORE 2004
+++++
For a free subscription to The Martin County Defender, send request with “Subscribe” in the subject line to: mc-defender@comcast.net
Comments and requests to unsubscribe may be sent to this same address.
Al
Al Forman, Editor 8/1/08
The Martin County Defender is published and Copyright 2008 by WordsmithAmerica,
Box 1828, Palm City, FL 34991. All rights reserved. No part of this issue may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording for public or private use, or by any information storage or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the publisher. NOTICE: All correspondence not bearing legal copyright notice which is sent to the Defender or its editor is subject to being edited and published.
All previous issues of the Defender are archived at our website:
--
Al Forman
mc_defender@fastmail.net
Sphere: Related Content
